Compliance

Under the EU AI Act (2024), AI companies are obliged to mark text generated by their LLMs as of August 2nd 2026. This means that companies who signed the EU Code of Practice on Transparency are introducing ways to do so. Failure to comply with text-marking could result in fines of up to €15 million, or 3% of worldwide annual turnover. Much coverage has been given to Claude’s announced rollout of watermarking. In reality there’s actually very little to say.

Most organisations now have an AI strategy. Very few have asked what it is doing to the planet. That is not an abstract concern. It is a capital allocation question with a measurable environmental consequence attached to it. Boards are declining to ask it. The omission will not age well.

Just about every senior leader has already decided to adopt AI. The all understand the risks of not doing, and a large proportion of them understand the risks of doing so. The question some aren't asking is what happens when one of the risks becomes real, and whether they can recover from it.

The board asked for an AI strategy. What they got was a vendor presentation dressed in strategy's clothes. The vocabulary is being set by people with a commercial interest in your confusion. AI is not complicated. The industry around it is. What follows is the version of this conversation that the hyperbolic presentations skip. Here's the AI landscape for executives.

Developing concepts with Claude means understanding how Gen AI works and working with it's limitations. During an exploratory workflow today I ask it several questions as starting points to develop the nucleus of a concept. It came back with systems logic: structure, audience, constraints, examples. I told it the thinking would emerge from exploration instead. The AI pushed back. We went sideways anyway.

Evaluating Claude Sonnet 4.6 for 'reasoning redline', defensive hallucinations and structural bias.