Under the EU AI Act (2024), AI companies are obliged to mark text generated by their LLMs as of August 2nd 2026. This means that companies who signed the EU Code of Practice on Transparency are introducing ways to do so. Failure to comply with text-marking could result in fines of up to €15 million, or 3% of worldwide annual turnover. Much coverage has been given to Claude’s announced rollout of watermarking. In reality there’s actually very little to say.

Once you've played around with AI for any length of time and got under the skin of LLMs, you inevitably start to uncover the quirks, weaknesses and vulnerabilities inherent to the fundamental design concepts, and the execution itself. As seen in my other AI projects on the site, it's not hard to trigger those weaknesses once you get beyond basic GenAI and into genuine design and build scenarios.

Most organisations now have an AI strategy. Very few have asked what it is doing to the planet. That is not an abstract concern. It is a capital allocation question with a measurable environmental consequence attached to it. Boards are declining to ask it. The omission will not age well.

For decades the businesses of expertise, craftsmanship and luxury have run on a simple exchange: you paid for authority because authority was grounded in the living presence of a specific person. A marketer. A strategist. A lawyer. Someone who could sit across from you, who had walked through the problem themselves, whose judgement was embodied in a living mind that you could hire and pay. Presence became the marker of truth. Not the accuracy of what they said, but the fact t

Developing concepts with Claude means understanding how Gen AI works and working with it's limitations. During an exploratory workflow today I ask it several questions as starting points to develop the nucleus of a concept. It came back with systems logic: structure, audience, constraints, examples. I told it the thinking would emerge from exploration instead. The AI pushed back. We went sideways anyway.

Call this the rising floor. Every useful machine absorbs the layer of work it can do better than people. The human contribution does not vanish. It moves upward, into judgement, selection, taste, and ethics, questions a machine cannot answer for you because they are not technical questions at all. That is where AI is heading now, into code, legal drafting, HR policy, marketing copy, the layer of execution that used to define a competent professional.

Evaluating Claude Sonnet 4.6 for 'reasoning redline', defensive hallucinations and structural bias.